

As a 2007 adaptation, I Am Legend has the advantage of being a story tested by time, and yet not so well known that there will be an angry fan base. The book is important historically, though without the 2007 adaptation starring Will Smith, contemporary readers wouldn’t bump into it in an airport bookstore. With I Am Legend we have an intriguing opportunity to compare book and film. My solution to go around the problem- I got in a bit of trouble here-doesn’t take away from the fact that I think the books are far better than the films, even if I am a big fan of the LOTR trilogy on screen. The arguments around Peter Jackson’s Middle Earth adaptations, where there is both heat and light, shows a number of dividing lines. Some people, of course, never feel a film shows fidelity to the original author. I am both a book-lover and a film buff, so I am open to the idea that a film might be better than the book. Someone mentioned The Princess Bride to me lately, and I agree that the film has it hands down. It is rare that I hear a true book-lover say that the film was better than the book, but I’m sure we can find exceptions.

Today, the mythic relevance of the film takes a new shape–a shape that I think helps restore one of the beauties of Richard Matheson’s original novella. In 2011, the conversation about I Am Legend and H1N1 was about the limits of human science.

Like then, thoughts of plagues, death, and social breakdown bother our minds–and the fact that New York City is contagion ground zero in the film and one of today’s COVID-19 hotspots is not insignificant. I Am Legend took on a new significance in 2011 with the outbreak of H1N1 in 2011, fuelling conspiracy theories and providing teachers like me with great material for the classroom. I have decided to use Robert Neville from I Am Legend as the starting point. I am preaching tomorrow on the topic, “It is not Good for Man to be Alone” (Gen 2:18).
